Why We Repeat What Hurts
- Dr. Zackery Tedder
- Apr 15
- 3 min read

We don’t repeat painful patterns because we’re broken. We repeat them because they’re familiar.
This can be difficult to admit, especially for people who are insightful, self-aware, and well-read. Many assume that if we understand the problem, we should be able to stop it. But insight is not the same as rewiring. The better question is often not “Why do I keep doing this?” but:
What does this pain remind me of?
And even more importantly:
When did this start to feel like safety?
Introducing Familiarity Risk Management (FRM)
Familiarity Risk Management, or FRM, is the term I use to describe the subconscious instinct to choose what is known over what is uncertain, even when what is known continues to harm us.
It is not a disorder. It is not a personality flaw. It is a survival strategy.
When we are faced with threat, trauma, or instability, the nervous system does not always seek out what is best. It seeks out what is predictable.
This is how we find ourselves: returning to emotionally distant relationships; accepting burnout as a baseline; avoiding conflict in families that never taught resolution; and living in emotional stillness, mistaking it for peace.
These patterns are not random. They are strategies. We are managing perceived risk by clinging to what we already know how to survive...even if it hurts.
It’s Not Self-Sabotage. It’s Survival Logic.
If you have ever felt defeated by your own loops, like you know better but still can’t seem to do better, this is not proof that you are failing. It is proof that your nervous system still believes what is familiar is safer than what is unknown.
Familiarity Risk Management reframes the entire conversation. You are not sabotaging yourself. You are trying to survive, using the only language your body trusts.
The loop you are in may not be helping you thrive. But it may have helped you endure.
And endurance often looks like repetition.
Why Familiar Doesn’t Always Mean Safe
We are often taught that comfort equals safety. But Familiarity Risk Management reveals that comfort often just means something feels predictable. Not that it is good for us. Not that it is aligned with who we are becoming.
Many people stay in relationships that drain them because they know how to navigate the conflict. They stay in jobs that exhaust them because the alternative feels uncertain. They avoid healthy dynamics because they are foreign, and therefore, threatening.
The nervous system does not ask, “Is this healthy?” It asks, “Have I survived this before?”
The First Step Is Naming It
Familiarity Risk Management offers a way to understand why we keep finding ourselves in the same places. It gives us language to describe what used to be called “self-sabotage” or “resistance.” It helps us reclaim agency, by helping us see that we are not stuck because we are broken. We are stuck because our sense of safety is tied to what we have survived.
Change begins by asking a very different set of questions:
Is this pattern familiar, or is it safe?
Is this comfort, or is it just what I’ve always known?
What would it mean to trust something new?
The Work Ahead
If this resonates with you, know that you are not alone. You are not lazy. You are not weak. You are not behind. You're just protecting yourself from the risks you can’t yet predict. And you are doing so with an outdated sense of what “safe” feels like.
The work ahead is not to abandon who you’ve been, but to help your system recognize when a pattern no longer serves you. It is about building a new relationship with risk. Learning that unfamiliar does not always mean unsafe. And understanding that repetition is not always resilience.
This is what Familiarity Risk Management is here to explore. Not to shame the patterns, but to name them. So you can finally choose something else.
Follow along at drzacktedder.com on Instagram and X at @drzacktedder to keep learning how these patterns form, and more importantly, how they finally break.
Comments